<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 604 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374977</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petitioner&#039;s request for a stay of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, citing ongoing proceedings and lack of justification for interference. The court also allowed the petitioner to pay outstanding taxes in installments with penal interest, specifying a strict monthly payment schedule. Ultimately, the court dismissed the Special Leave Petition and related applications, finding no basis for further intervention in the National Company Law Appellant Tribunal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2019 06:07:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557562" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 604 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374977</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petitioner&#039;s request for a stay of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, citing ongoing proceedings and lack of justification for interference. The court also allowed the petitioner to pay outstanding taxes in installments with penal interest, specifying a strict monthly payment schedule. Ultimately, the court dismissed the Special Leave Petition and related applications, finding no basis for further intervention in the National Company Law Appellant Tribunal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>