https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374964 The Tribunal remanded the case concerning the demand of CENVAT credit under Rule 6(3) of CCR and imposition of interest and penalty. It found discrepancies in the application of the rule and denial of proportionate credit reversal. The impugned order was set aside due to lack of consideration of documentary evidence and the appellant's response, leading to a violation of natural justice. The case was remanded for a fresh decision, emphasizing the need to consider all aspects, provide a personal hearing, and ensure compliance with legal principles. en-us Tue, 05 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Feb 2019 06:07:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374964 The Tribunal remanded the case concerning the demand of CENVAT credit under Rule 6(3) of CCR and imposition of interest and penalty. It found discrepancies in the application of the rule and denial of proportionate credit reversal. The impugned order was set aside due to lack of consideration of documentary evidence and the appellant's response, leading to a violation of natural justice. The case was remanded for a fresh decision, emphasizing the need to consider all aspects, provide a personal hearing, and ensure compliance with legal principles. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 05 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374964