https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374947 The tribunal upheld the impugned order, rejecting the appeal and confirming the demand for service tax, interest, and penalties. The tribunal found that the additional amount charged for loading urea rakes at a different siding was not solely for transportation but also covered expenses related to cargo handling. The tribunal concluded that the appellant's argument that the amount was only for transportation was not supported by the agreement and invoices, ruling in favor of taxing the additional charges in the context of cargo handling services. en-us Tue, 01 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Jun 2019 14:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374947 The tribunal upheld the impugned order, rejecting the appeal and confirming the demand for service tax, interest, and penalties. The tribunal found that the additional amount charged for loading urea rakes at a different siding was not solely for transportation but also covered expenses related to cargo handling. The tribunal concluded that the appellant's argument that the amount was only for transportation was not supported by the agreement and invoices, ruling in favor of taxing the additional charges in the context of cargo handling services. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 01 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374947