https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374943 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing that after making the payment under Rule 6(3)(i), no further demand for cenvat credit can be sustained. The Tribunal found the demand beyond the normal period not sustainable, citing lack of suppression of facts by the appellant. As a result, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed. en-us Tue, 12 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Feb 2019 06:06:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374943 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing that after making the payment under Rule 6(3)(i), no further demand for cenvat credit can be sustained. The Tribunal found the demand beyond the normal period not sustainable, citing lack of suppression of facts by the appellant. As a result, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 12 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374943