https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374941 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision to set aside the demand for the appellant to pay 6% of the value of bagasse cleared, ruling in favor of the appellant. The Tribunal determined that bagasse qualified as an exempted good under Rule 6(2) of the CCR, 2004, and the appellant was not liable to pay the prescribed amount under Rule 6(3). The Tribunal relied on established legal principles and precedents, dismissing the Revenue's appeals and affirming the appellant's position based on previous decisions in similar cases. en-us Fri, 08 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Feb 2019 06:06:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374941 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision to set aside the demand for the appellant to pay 6% of the value of bagasse cleared, ruling in favor of the appellant. The Tribunal determined that bagasse qualified as an exempted good under Rule 6(2) of the CCR, 2004, and the appellant was not liable to pay the prescribed amount under Rule 6(3). The Tribunal relied on established legal principles and precedents, dismissing the Revenue's appeals and affirming the appellant's position based on previous decisions in similar cases. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 08 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374941