<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 564 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374937</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, stating that the appellant was entitled to SSI Exemption only from December 2006 onwards. The adjudicating authority was directed to re-quantify the demand and issue a fresh order. The appeal was disposed of through remand on these terms, emphasizing the importance of accurate disclosure in declarations to avoid mis-declarations and uphold tax obligations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 17:19:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557522" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 564 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374937</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, stating that the appellant was entitled to SSI Exemption only from December 2006 onwards. The adjudicating authority was directed to re-quantify the demand and issue a fresh order. The appeal was disposed of through remand on these terms, emphasizing the importance of accurate disclosure in declarations to avoid mis-declarations and uphold tax obligations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374937</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>