https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374935 The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the appellants, setting aside the impugned orders by the Commissioner (A) regarding the demand for 6% of the value of electricity sold as CENVAT credit. Relying on legal principles and precedents, including decisions like Gularia Chini Mills and Jakarya Sugars Ltd., the Tribunal found the demand unsustainable due to the lack of evidence of common inputs. The decision was made on 31/01/2019, providing relief to the appellants in all six appeals. en-us Thu, 31 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Feb 2019 06:05:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374935 The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the appellants, setting aside the impugned orders by the Commissioner (A) regarding the demand for 6% of the value of electricity sold as CENVAT credit. Relying on legal principles and precedents, including decisions like Gularia Chini Mills and Jakarya Sugars Ltd., the Tribunal found the demand unsustainable due to the lack of evidence of common inputs. The decision was made on 31/01/2019, providing relief to the appellants in all six appeals. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 31 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374935