https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374934 The Tribunal found that the appellant's appeal before the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) was maintainable despite not directly challenging the order of sanctioning the refund claim into the Cenvat credit account. By requesting modification, the appellant effectively challenged the adjudication order. Additionally, the appeal filed against the rejection of their request was deemed timely, considering the time taken by the adjudicating authority in reviewing the modification request. The Tribunal held that all refund claims should be sanctioned in cash as per the law, setting aside the previous order and granting the appellant the right to claim the refund in cash. en-us Thu, 31 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Jun 2019 12:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374934 The Tribunal found that the appellant's appeal before the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) was maintainable despite not directly challenging the order of sanctioning the refund claim into the Cenvat credit account. By requesting modification, the appellant effectively challenged the adjudication order. Additionally, the appeal filed against the rejection of their request was deemed timely, considering the time taken by the adjudicating authority in reviewing the modification request. The Tribunal held that all refund claims should be sanctioned in cash as per the law, setting aside the previous order and granting the appellant the right to claim the refund in cash. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 31 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374934