<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 556 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374929</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit on iron and steel items used in fabrication of capital goods was disputed on the basis of a departmental verification report. Reliance on that report was held impermissible because it was not supplied to the assessee and no opportunity was given to rebut it, making the adverse finding contrary to natural justice. The text also notes that credit for similar use had been supported by earlier decisions, and the denial of credit was therefore treated as unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2019 06:05:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557514" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 556 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374929</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit on iron and steel items used in fabrication of capital goods was disputed on the basis of a departmental verification report. Reliance on that report was held impermissible because it was not supplied to the assessee and no opportunity was given to rebut it, making the adverse finding contrary to natural justice. The text also notes that credit for similar use had been supported by earlier decisions, and the denial of credit was therefore treated as unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374929</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>