<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 552 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374925</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand for CENVAT credit reversal on electricity sold outside. The decision was based on established legal principles and precedents, concluding that electricity generated from bagasse does not attract excise duty, making Rule 6 inapplicable. The Tribunal provided consequential relief to the appellant, highlighting the failure of the Department to identify specific input services used in electricity generation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2019 06:05:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557510" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 552 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374925</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand for CENVAT credit reversal on electricity sold outside. The decision was based on established legal principles and precedents, concluding that electricity generated from bagasse does not attract excise duty, making Rule 6 inapplicable. The Tribunal provided consequential relief to the appellant, highlighting the failure of the Department to identify specific input services used in electricity generation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>