https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374921 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to reverse the appellant's acquittal and convict them under Section 20(ii)(c) of the NDPS Act. The Court found compliance with procedural requirements, including the production of seals and confirmation of the seized material as "charas." It determined that there was no violation of Section 100(4) of the Cr.P.C. or Sections 50, 52, and 57 of the NDPS Act, as the contraband was seized from gunny bags on a scooter. The Court also addressed the credibility of witnesses and the role of PW10, dismissing the appeals and clarifying the prospective application of the Mohan Lal judgment. en-us Mon, 11 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Feb 2019 06:04:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374921 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to reverse the appellant's acquittal and convict them under Section 20(ii)(c) of the NDPS Act. The Court found compliance with procedural requirements, including the production of seals and confirmation of the seized material as "charas." It determined that there was no violation of Section 100(4) of the Cr.P.C. or Sections 50, 52, and 57 of the NDPS Act, as the contraband was seized from gunny bags on a scooter. The Court also addressed the credibility of witnesses and the role of PW10, dismissing the appeals and clarifying the prospective application of the Mohan Lal judgment. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 11 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374921