https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374920 The SC held that revisional courts cannot interfere with conviction orders absent jurisdictional or legal errors, even if the order appears wrong. The Court clarified that fiduciary relationships between cheque drawer and payee do not disentitle the payee from Section 139 presumption benefits under the Negotiable Instruments Act, unless undue influence or coercion is proven. The drawer remains liable for duly signed cheques regardless of who filled them, provided no theft, threat, or coercion occurred. The HC erred in placing burden on complainant to prove loan advancement and cheque issuance for repayment. Appeals were allowed, reversing the HC's decision. en-us Wed, 06 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Jul 2025 15:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374920 The SC held that revisional courts cannot interfere with conviction orders absent jurisdictional or legal errors, even if the order appears wrong. The Court clarified that fiduciary relationships between cheque drawer and payee do not disentitle the payee from Section 139 presumption benefits under the Negotiable Instruments Act, unless undue influence or coercion is proven. The drawer remains liable for duly signed cheques regardless of who filled them, provided no theft, threat, or coercion occurred. The HC erred in placing burden on complainant to prove loan advancement and cheque issuance for repayment. Appeals were allowed, reversing the HC's decision. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 06 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374920