https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374917 The High Court upheld the order of issuance of process under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding the complaint contained sufficient averments to establish cognizance. The court emphasized that basic averments were satisfactory for initiating proceedings and refused to quash the order solely on these grounds. While the accused presented material to show their non-involvement, the court held that such evidence was not conclusive. The court clarified that interference was warranted only with undeniable evidence negating the accused's role, ultimately rejecting the application to quash the process order. en-us Fri, 08 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Feb 2019 06:04:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374917 The High Court upheld the order of issuance of process under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding the complaint contained sufficient averments to establish cognizance. The court emphasized that basic averments were satisfactory for initiating proceedings and refused to quash the order solely on these grounds. While the accused presented material to show their non-involvement, the court held that such evidence was not conclusive. The court clarified that interference was warranted only with undeniable evidence negating the accused's role, ultimately rejecting the application to quash the process order. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 08 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374917