<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1603 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278574</link>
    <description>The assessee was denied deductions under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act by the Assessing Officer for being classified as a cooperative bank rather than a primary agricultural credit society. The CIT(A) and Tribunal upheld this decision. Additionally, contributions to an unrecognized Superannuation Fund were disallowed as they did not meet the criteria under sections 36(1)(iv) and 36(1)(v) of the Act. The Tribunal remitted the matter back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration based on previous findings. The appeals by the assessee were dismissed, and those by the revenue were allowed for statistical purposes, with directions for reassessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2019 06:04:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557499" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1603 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278574</link>
      <description>The assessee was denied deductions under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act by the Assessing Officer for being classified as a cooperative bank rather than a primary agricultural credit society. The CIT(A) and Tribunal upheld this decision. Additionally, contributions to an unrecognized Superannuation Fund were disallowed as they did not meet the criteria under sections 36(1)(iv) and 36(1)(v) of the Act. The Tribunal remitted the matter back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration based on previous findings. The appeals by the assessee were dismissed, and those by the revenue were allowed for statistical purposes, with directions for reassessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278574</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>