https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278578 The Madras HC directed the respondent to examine whether excess tax allegedly paid could be adjusted against the demand raised under the impugned order. The representation was to be treated as a petition under Section 84 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, and the petitioner was to be given a personal hearing before a speaking order was passed within the stipulated time. Recovery proceedings were stayed only to the extent of the amount claimed for adjustment, pending that decision. en-us Tue, 31 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Feb 2019 06:04:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278578 The Madras HC directed the respondent to examine whether excess tax allegedly paid could be adjusted against the demand raised under the impugned order. The representation was to be treated as a petition under Section 84 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, and the petitioner was to be given a personal hearing before a speaking order was passed within the stipulated time. Recovery proceedings were stayed only to the extent of the amount claimed for adjustment, pending that decision. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 31 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278578