<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1763 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278580</link>
    <description>A contractual commercial operation date under a power purchase agreement could not be treated as achieved where the performance test certificate did not satisfy the stipulated 95% contracted-capacity standard and the commissioning conditions remained unmet. The Court held that waiver of that requirement was not established because waiver needs a clear and intentional relinquishment of a known contractual right; the correspondence showed only a limited operational acceptance of de-rated capacity, not waiver of the COD condition. It further held that any waiver affecting tariff in a competitively bid electricity arrangement could not be enforced where it would prejudice consumer and public interest. The finding accepting COD on 31.3.2013 and waiver was therefore set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2021 15:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557493" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1763 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278580</link>
      <description>A contractual commercial operation date under a power purchase agreement could not be treated as achieved where the performance test certificate did not satisfy the stipulated 95% contracted-capacity standard and the commissioning conditions remained unmet. The Court held that waiver of that requirement was not established because waiver needs a clear and intentional relinquishment of a known contractual right; the correspondence showed only a limited operational acceptance of de-rated capacity, not waiver of the COD condition. It further held that any waiver affecting tariff in a competitively bid electricity arrangement could not be enforced where it would prejudice consumer and public interest. The finding accepting COD on 31.3.2013 and waiver was therefore set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278580</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>