<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1798 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278582</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by different assessees, declaring the reassessment orders as barred by limitation. The reassessment order served beyond the prescribed period was deemed invalid, leading to the lower authorities&#039; orders being set aside. Consequently, the appeals for the assessment years 2004-2005, 2005-2006, and 2006-2007 for various assessees were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2019 06:04:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557491" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1798 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278582</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by different assessees, declaring the reassessment orders as barred by limitation. The reassessment order served beyond the prescribed period was deemed invalid, leading to the lower authorities&#039; orders being set aside. Consequently, the appeals for the assessment years 2004-2005, 2005-2006, and 2006-2007 for various assessees were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278582</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>