<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1800 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278585</link>
    <description>Writ jurisdiction was held not to be available where the impugned assessment-related order was appealable under the statutory scheme and the dispute turned on factual matters arising from the works contract and supporting documents. The Court found that the authorities had considered the material placed by the petitioner and that no clear breach of natural justice was shown. As an efficacious statutory remedy was available, the petition was not entertained in writ jurisdiction and the petitioner was left to pursue the appropriate appellate remedy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2019 06:04:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1800 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278585</link>
      <description>Writ jurisdiction was held not to be available where the impugned assessment-related order was appealable under the statutory scheme and the dispute turned on factual matters arising from the works contract and supporting documents. The Court found that the authorities had considered the material placed by the petitioner and that no clear breach of natural justice was shown. As an efficacious statutory remedy was available, the petition was not entertained in writ jurisdiction and the petitioner was left to pursue the appropriate appellate remedy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>