<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1800 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278585</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging a tax order under the Karnataka VAT Act for the period April 2014 to March 2015 regarding the tax treatment of a Civil Works Contract involving &quot;Ductile Iron Pipes&quot; at 14.5%. The petitioner argued for a lower tax rate of 5.5%, citing specific provisions and precedent. However, the court emphasized the availability of appeal mechanisms under the Act and the need for factual examination by relevant authorities in tax disputes. The court found no violation of natural justice principles by the Assessing Authority and allowed the petitioner to pursue further legal remedies within a specified timeframe.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2019 06:04:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1800 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278585</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging a tax order under the Karnataka VAT Act for the period April 2014 to March 2015 regarding the tax treatment of a Civil Works Contract involving &quot;Ductile Iron Pipes&quot; at 14.5%. The petitioner argued for a lower tax rate of 5.5%, citing specific provisions and precedent. However, the court emphasized the availability of appeal mechanisms under the Act and the need for factual examination by relevant authorities in tax disputes. The court found no violation of natural justice principles by the Assessing Authority and allowed the petitioner to pursue further legal remedies within a specified timeframe.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>