<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (2) TMI 118 - MYSORE HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278567</link>
    <description>When a firm discontinues business, the partners become jointly and severally liable for the tax assessed on the firm, and a demand notice may be served on them as persons liable without a fresh assessment order against each partner. The provision discussed does not prescribe any limitation period for service of the demand notice, and delay alone does not invalidate it absent prejudice or a statutory bar. Omission to state the recipient&#039;s status in the notice does not vitiate recovery where the basis of liability is otherwise clear. Because liability is joint and several, the revenue may proceed separately against individual partners rather than by one joint notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2019 17:16:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (2) TMI 118 - MYSORE HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278567</link>
      <description>When a firm discontinues business, the partners become jointly and severally liable for the tax assessed on the firm, and a demand notice may be served on them as persons liable without a fresh assessment order against each partner. The provision discussed does not prescribe any limitation period for service of the demand notice, and delay alone does not invalidate it absent prejudice or a statutory bar. Omission to state the recipient&#039;s status in the notice does not vitiate recovery where the basis of liability is otherwise clear. Because liability is joint and several, the revenue may proceed separately against individual partners rather than by one joint notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>