<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 540 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374913</link>
    <description>Section 67(2) of the CGST Act was challenged on the ground that the search and seizure proceedings were authority of law because there was no reason to believe. The HC did not decide the merits of that challenge and only issued notice, returnable on 21 February 2019, with direct service permitted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2025 11:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557408" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 540 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374913</link>
      <description>Section 67(2) of the CGST Act was challenged on the ground that the search and seizure proceedings were authority of law because there was no reason to believe. The HC did not decide the merits of that challenge and only issued notice, returnable on 21 February 2019, with direct service permitted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374913</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>