<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 538 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374911</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal challenging the disallowance of brokerage charges. The assessee withdrew the claim before the CIT(A) after evidence showed the payments were not genuine. The Tribunal found no legal mistake in the concession and granted limited relief based on the remand report. It concluded that no question of law arose, affirming the addition of &amp;amp;8377; 61.71 lacs and dismissing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2019 07:06:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557406" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 538 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374911</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal challenging the disallowance of brokerage charges. The assessee withdrew the claim before the CIT(A) after evidence showed the payments were not genuine. The Tribunal found no legal mistake in the concession and granted limited relief based on the remand report. It concluded that no question of law arose, affirming the addition of &amp;amp;8377; 61.71 lacs and dismissing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374911</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>