<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 529 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374902</link>
    <description>The court held that the notice of reopening of assessment for the Assessment Year 2011-12 was invalid as it was issued beyond the prescribed time limit and lacked sufficient grounds. The Assessing Officer failed to demonstrate that the income had escaped assessment due to the Assessee&#039;s failure to disclose material facts. As a result, the notice was set aside, and the Petition was disposed of in favor of the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2019 07:06:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 529 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374902</link>
      <description>The court held that the notice of reopening of assessment for the Assessment Year 2011-12 was invalid as it was issued beyond the prescribed time limit and lacked sufficient grounds. The Assessing Officer failed to demonstrate that the income had escaped assessment due to the Assessee&#039;s failure to disclose material facts. As a result, the notice was set aside, and the Petition was disposed of in favor of the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374902</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>