<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 525 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374898</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, deleting the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) due to the lack of conclusive evidence supporting the ad hoc disallowances made by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of concrete evidence and specific grounds for penalty initiation under the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2019 20:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557393" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 525 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374898</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, deleting the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) due to the lack of conclusive evidence supporting the ad hoc disallowances made by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of concrete evidence and specific grounds for penalty initiation under the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374898</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>