https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374883 The judgment addressed issues involving allegations of suppression of fact/fraud, invocation of extended limitation period, reliance on precedent, benefit of specific notifications, Tribunal's oversight in addressing allegations, and the non-appealable nature of the substantive conclusion. The decision favored the assessee, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal. The Tribunal's findings were supported by precedent and specific notifications, rendering the extended limitation period irrelevant and affirming the assessee's entitlement to benefits, ultimately upholding the substantive conclusion in favor of the assessee. en-us Thu, 31 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Feb 2019 07:05:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374883 The judgment addressed issues involving allegations of suppression of fact/fraud, invocation of extended limitation period, reliance on precedent, benefit of specific notifications, Tribunal's oversight in addressing allegations, and the non-appealable nature of the substantive conclusion. The decision favored the assessee, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal. The Tribunal's findings were supported by precedent and specific notifications, rendering the extended limitation period irrelevant and affirming the assessee's entitlement to benefits, ultimately upholding the substantive conclusion in favor of the assessee. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 31 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374883