<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 507 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374880</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the adjudicating authority&#039;s order confirming a demand for cost recovery charges against the appellant. It concluded that the appellant was entitled to exemption from such charges based on Ministry letters and the encadrement of posts, emphasizing that the legal provisions of HCCAR, 2009, did not support the recovery of unpaid charges as pursued by the authority. The decision was pronounced on 1.2.2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2019 17:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557375" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 507 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374880</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the adjudicating authority&#039;s order confirming a demand for cost recovery charges against the appellant. It concluded that the appellant was entitled to exemption from such charges based on Ministry letters and the encadrement of posts, emphasizing that the legal provisions of HCCAR, 2009, did not support the recovery of unpaid charges as pursued by the authority. The decision was pronounced on 1.2.2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374880</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>