https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374866 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, manufacturers of sugar molasses, rectified spirit, and denatured spirit, stating they were not obligated to register as a manpower supplier or discharge tax liability as a service provider. The Tribunal found that the appellants merely arranged labor for sugarcane cutting at the request of farmers and did not qualify as manpower suppliers. Citing precedents and specific circumstances, the Tribunal set aside the tax demand, interest, and penalties imposed by the department, allowing the appeal and granting consequential benefits as per the law. en-us Wed, 06 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Feb 2019 07:04:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374866 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, manufacturers of sugar molasses, rectified spirit, and denatured spirit, stating they were not obligated to register as a manpower supplier or discharge tax liability as a service provider. The Tribunal found that the appellants merely arranged labor for sugarcane cutting at the request of farmers and did not qualify as manpower suppliers. Citing precedents and specific circumstances, the Tribunal set aside the tax demand, interest, and penalties imposed by the department, allowing the appeal and granting consequential benefits as per the law. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 06 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374866