<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 489 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374862</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed by way of remand to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a comprehensive reconsideration of whether the services provided by the appellant qualified as clearing and forwarding agent service. The Tribunal found the initial order lacked reasoning and failed to consider crucial arguments and legal principles presented by the appellant. The matter was remanded to ensure a fair hearing and proper examination of all aspects before reaching a decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2019 07:04:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557357" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 489 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374862</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed by way of remand to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a comprehensive reconsideration of whether the services provided by the appellant qualified as clearing and forwarding agent service. The Tribunal found the initial order lacked reasoning and failed to consider crucial arguments and legal principles presented by the appellant. The matter was remanded to ensure a fair hearing and proper examination of all aspects before reaching a decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374862</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>