<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 479 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374852</link>
    <description>A refund claim for waste disposal services was rejected on a ground not stated in the show cause notice, namely that the services were not approved by the Development Commissioner. The adjudication was therefore beyond the notice and violated natural justice. The rejection could not stand in that form, and the matter was remanded to the original authority for fresh proceedings after issuance of a proper notice and adjudication on all amounts proposed for rejection. The merits were left open for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2019 07:04:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557347" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 479 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374852</link>
      <description>A refund claim for waste disposal services was rejected on a ground not stated in the show cause notice, namely that the services were not approved by the Development Commissioner. The adjudication was therefore beyond the notice and violated natural justice. The rejection could not stand in that form, and the matter was remanded to the original authority for fresh proceedings after issuance of a proper notice and adjudication on all amounts proposed for rejection. The merits were left open for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374852</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>