<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (10) TMI 73 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16734</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee regarding the registration of the firm and the benamidar status of the daughter-in-law. It ruled that both the assessee and the Assessing Officer have the right to file cross-objections against the order in appeal, and the Tribunal must consider them as appeals. The Court clarified that cross-objections are not limited to points raised by the opposite party in the main appeal, allowing parties to challenge various aspects of the appellate authority&#039;s order. The daughter-in-law was not deemed a benamidar for her father-in-law due to her lack of knowledge about certain financial matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 17:06:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55734" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (10) TMI 73 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16734</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee regarding the registration of the firm and the benamidar status of the daughter-in-law. It ruled that both the assessee and the Assessing Officer have the right to file cross-objections against the order in appeal, and the Tribunal must consider them as appeals. The Court clarified that cross-objections are not limited to points raised by the opposite party in the main appeal, allowing parties to challenge various aspects of the appellate authority&#039;s order. The daughter-in-law was not deemed a benamidar for her father-in-law due to her lack of knowledge about certain financial matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16734</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>