<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 1348 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278538</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision on disallowance of depreciation under section 11(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the treatment of the carry forward deficit. The ITAT found the issues were settled by the Bombay High Court&#039;s decisions, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s arguments based on Supreme Court judgments. The decision was rendered on 27/02/2014.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2019 07:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557332" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 1348 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278538</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision on disallowance of depreciation under section 11(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the treatment of the carry forward deficit. The ITAT found the issues were settled by the Bombay High Court&#039;s decisions, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s arguments based on Supreme Court judgments. The decision was rendered on 27/02/2014.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278538</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>