<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1509 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278544</link>
    <description>A charitable trust registered under section 12A may carry forward a deficit and set it off against income of later years while computing income under section 11 when binding jurisdictional precedent supports that treatment. The Tribunal applied High Court authority recognising excess expenditure or deficit as allowable for carry forward in charitable institutions, and treated the Department&#039;s separate challenge in another matter as irrelevant while the precedent remained operative. It also followed its own prior decision in the same assessee&#039;s case for the preceding year. The assessee was therefore entitled to the claimed set-off in subsequent years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2019 07:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557326" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1509 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278544</link>
      <description>A charitable trust registered under section 12A may carry forward a deficit and set it off against income of later years while computing income under section 11 when binding jurisdictional precedent supports that treatment. The Tribunal applied High Court authority recognising excess expenditure or deficit as allowable for carry forward in charitable institutions, and treated the Department&#039;s separate challenge in another matter as irrelevant while the precedent remained operative. It also followed its own prior decision in the same assessee&#039;s case for the preceding year. The assessee was therefore entitled to the claimed set-off in subsequent years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278544</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>