<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (12) TMI 13 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16732</link>
    <description>A second application for waiver of interest was held not maintainable where the earlier request had already been rejected on the same facts, and a statutory amendment shifting the decision-making power from the Board to the Commissioner did not revive a fresh right to seek the same relief. Waiver under Section 220(2A) of the Income-tax Act requires all statutory conditions to be cumulatively satisfied; on the record, genuine hardship and circumstances beyond the assessee&#039;s control were not established, so discretionary relief was unavailable. The refusals of waiver were therefore upheld and the writ petition failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 17:02:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55732" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (12) TMI 13 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16732</link>
      <description>A second application for waiver of interest was held not maintainable where the earlier request had already been rejected on the same facts, and a statutory amendment shifting the decision-making power from the Board to the Commissioner did not revive a fresh right to seek the same relief. Waiver under Section 220(2A) of the Income-tax Act requires all statutory conditions to be cumulatively satisfied; on the record, genuine hardship and circumstances beyond the assessee&#039;s control were not established, so discretionary relief was unavailable. The refusals of waiver were therefore upheld and the writ petition failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16732</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>