<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1782 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278557</link>
    <description>Under unamended Section 38 of the Insurance Act, life insurance policies were assignable as of right once the prescribed procedure for assignment was completed, and the insurer&#039;s role was limited to recording the transfer and recognising the assignee&#039;s entitlement to policy benefits. The insurer had no discretion to refuse registration of a valid assignment, and circulars restricting such assignments were inconsistent with the statutory scheme and unenforceable. The later amendment introducing an express power to decline assignments in specified cases was a substantive change, not a clarificatory or retrospective one. A delegate cannot override a statutory right conferred by the parent Act through circulars or policy instructions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2019 07:03:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557313" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1782 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278557</link>
      <description>Under unamended Section 38 of the Insurance Act, life insurance policies were assignable as of right once the prescribed procedure for assignment was completed, and the insurer&#039;s role was limited to recording the transfer and recognising the assignee&#039;s entitlement to policy benefits. The insurer had no discretion to refuse registration of a valid assignment, and circulars restricting such assignments were inconsistent with the statutory scheme and unenforceable. The later amendment introducing an express power to decline assignments in specified cases was a substantive change, not a clarificatory or retrospective one. A delegate cannot override a statutory right conferred by the parent Act through circulars or policy instructions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278557</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>