<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (8) TMI 42 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16729</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, stating that penalties under section 18(1)(a) of the Wealth-tax Act should be calculated based on the rates before and after the amendment. The decision emphasized the continuous default of not filing the return promptly and aligned with previous Supreme Court judgments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:55:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (8) TMI 42 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16729</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, stating that penalties under section 18(1)(a) of the Wealth-tax Act should be calculated based on the rates before and after the amendment. The decision emphasized the continuous default of not filing the return promptly and aligned with previous Supreme Court judgments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16729</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>