<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 719 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278532</link>
    <description>A transfer of suit property made after institution of a specific performance action is governed by lis pendens under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, so a subsequent purchaser cannot defeat the prior contractual claim on the ground of bona fide purchase without notice. The text also states that the plaintiff had adequately pleaded and proved readiness and willingness to perform the contract, and the defendant&#039;s objection under Section 16 of the Specific Relief Act did not succeed. On those findings, the decree for specific performance was sustained and the later sale remained subject to the pending litigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2019 17:32:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557289" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 719 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278532</link>
      <description>A transfer of suit property made after institution of a specific performance action is governed by lis pendens under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, so a subsequent purchaser cannot defeat the prior contractual claim on the ground of bona fide purchase without notice. The text also states that the plaintiff had adequately pleaded and proved readiness and willingness to perform the contract, and the defendant&#039;s objection under Section 16 of the Specific Relief Act did not succeed. On those findings, the decree for specific performance was sustained and the later sale remained subject to the pending litigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278532</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>