<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (7) TMI 82 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16728</link>
    <description>Non-compliance with section 144B in completing an assessment under section 143(3) does not make the assessment void ab initio. The procedure under section 144B governs the manner in which the Assessing Officer must proceed when the proposed variation crosses the prescribed limit, but it does not shift jurisdiction or forum. As the Assessing Officer retains seisin throughout and the Deputy Commissioner&#039;s role is only advisory, breach of the statutory procedure amounts to a mandatory procedural irregularity rather than a jurisdictional defect. The assessment therefore remains valid, subject to the procedural lapse.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:53:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55728" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (7) TMI 82 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16728</link>
      <description>Non-compliance with section 144B in completing an assessment under section 143(3) does not make the assessment void ab initio. The procedure under section 144B governs the manner in which the Assessing Officer must proceed when the proposed variation crosses the prescribed limit, but it does not shift jurisdiction or forum. As the Assessing Officer retains seisin throughout and the Deputy Commissioner&#039;s role is only advisory, breach of the statutory procedure amounts to a mandatory procedural irregularity rather than a jurisdictional defect. The assessment therefore remains valid, subject to the procedural lapse.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16728</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>