https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374835 Section 174 of the KSGST Act was upheld against an ultra vires challenge because the High Court treated the issue as already covered by its earlier judgment dated 11 January 2019 in W.P.(C) No. 11335 of 2018 and connected cases; the petitioners' objection was therefore rejected. The contention that the demand was barred by limitation under Section 25(1) of the KVAT Act was also treated as governed by the same earlier ratio and rejected on that basis. Applying that precedent, the court dismissed the writ petitions in full. en-us Thu, 24 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Mar 2025 12:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374835 Section 174 of the KSGST Act was upheld against an ultra vires challenge because the High Court treated the issue as already covered by its earlier judgment dated 11 January 2019 in W.P.(C) No. 11335 of 2018 and connected cases; the petitioners' objection was therefore rejected. The contention that the demand was barred by limitation under Section 25(1) of the KVAT Act was also treated as governed by the same earlier ratio and rejected on that basis. Applying that precedent, the court dismissed the writ petitions in full. Case-Laws GST Thu, 24 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374835