<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 448 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374821</link>
    <description>The document concerns whether confiscation, redemption fine and penalties under Section 114(1) and Section 114AA of the Customs Act were correctly upheld, and whether Notification No. 67 dated 23.1.2003 issued under Rule 11 of the Export (Quality Control and Inspection) Act, 1963 was rightly relied on. The Gujarat High Court admitted the appeal and framed these questions of law for consideration, without stating any final determination on the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2019 08:16:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557214" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 448 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374821</link>
      <description>The document concerns whether confiscation, redemption fine and penalties under Section 114(1) and Section 114AA of the Customs Act were correctly upheld, and whether Notification No. 67 dated 23.1.2003 issued under Rule 11 of the Export (Quality Control and Inspection) Act, 1963 was rightly relied on. The Gujarat High Court admitted the appeal and framed these questions of law for consideration, without stating any final determination on the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>