<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 439 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374812</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the levy of Service Tax on reimbursement expenses received by the appellant, ruling in favor of the appellant. The decision highlighted the invalidity of taxing such expenses and referenced a recent Supreme Court ruling that influenced the outcome. The Central Excise Duty demand was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, providing clarity on the interpretation of rules governing the taxation of service-related expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2019 08:04:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557204" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 439 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374812</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the levy of Service Tax on reimbursement expenses received by the appellant, ruling in favor of the appellant. The decision highlighted the invalidity of taxing such expenses and referenced a recent Supreme Court ruling that influenced the outcome. The Central Excise Duty demand was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, providing clarity on the interpretation of rules governing the taxation of service-related expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374812</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>