https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374807 The tribunal rejected the applications for rectification of mistake, emphasizing the non-binding nature of earlier orders by the Commissioner (Appeals) on the CESTAT. The decision underscored the reliance on judicial precedents, including judgments from the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay and the Hon'ble Apex Court, in decision-making. The judgment clarified the importance of independent assessment and adherence to legal precedents in resolving issues related to rectification of mistakes in final orders. en-us Tue, 20 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Feb 2019 07:42:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374807 The tribunal rejected the applications for rectification of mistake, emphasizing the non-binding nature of earlier orders by the Commissioner (Appeals) on the CESTAT. The decision underscored the reliance on judicial precedents, including judgments from the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay and the Hon'ble Apex Court, in decision-making. The judgment clarified the importance of independent assessment and adherence to legal precedents in resolving issues related to rectification of mistakes in final orders. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 20 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374807