https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278524 The High Court addressed the delay in passing the order under Section 110A of the Customs Act, 1962, causing the petitioner's deprivation of seized goods. The Court expressed dissatisfaction with the delay, emphasizing the importance of timely processing to prevent undue deprivation. The respondent assured the Court of issuing the order promptly within ten days. The Court re-listed the case for monitoring on 12th April, 2018, ensuring timely order issuance. The judgment stressed the significance of timely administrative actions in customs matters to protect individuals' rights and prevent prolonged deprivation of seized goods due to delays. en-us Fri, 16 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Feb 2019 07:33:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278524 The High Court addressed the delay in passing the order under Section 110A of the Customs Act, 1962, causing the petitioner's deprivation of seized goods. The Court expressed dissatisfaction with the delay, emphasizing the importance of timely processing to prevent undue deprivation. The respondent assured the Court of issuing the order promptly within ten days. The Court re-listed the case for monitoring on 12th April, 2018, ensuring timely order issuance. The judgment stressed the significance of timely administrative actions in customs matters to protect individuals' rights and prevent prolonged deprivation of seized goods due to delays. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 16 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278524