<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (6) TMI 76 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16716</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the addition of Rs. 1,04,000 to their income for failure to provide detailed particulars of the receipt of high denomination notes was not justified. The Court emphasized that once the source of the money was proven, further proof of the acquisition of specific denomination notes was not required. The decision was based on established legal principles and previous Supreme Court rulings, ultimately leading to the disposal of the reference with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:24:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (6) TMI 76 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16716</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the addition of Rs. 1,04,000 to their income for failure to provide detailed particulars of the receipt of high denomination notes was not justified. The Court emphasized that once the source of the money was proven, further proof of the acquisition of specific denomination notes was not required. The decision was based on established legal principles and previous Supreme Court rulings, ultimately leading to the disposal of the reference with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16716</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>