https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374775 The appellate tribunal upheld the impugned order, rejecting the revenue's appeal as the respondent complied with Rule 6 (3) by reversing the CENVAT credit for inputs and input services used in manufacturing exempted goods. The respondent's payment of the proportionate credit before the retrospective amendment was deemed correct, as per the legislation effective from 10.09.2004. The demand for payment was dropped as the respondent had paid the CENVAT credit with interest for the exempted goods, demonstrating compliance with the rules. en-us Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 Feb 2019 14:21:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374775 The appellate tribunal upheld the impugned order, rejecting the revenue's appeal as the respondent complied with Rule 6 (3) by reversing the CENVAT credit for inputs and input services used in manufacturing exempted goods. The respondent's payment of the proportionate credit before the retrospective amendment was deemed correct, as per the legislation effective from 10.09.2004. The demand for payment was dropped as the respondent had paid the CENVAT credit with interest for the exempted goods, demonstrating compliance with the rules. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374775