<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 401 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374774</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the transfer of CENVAT credit in the merger of two units and the availment of CENVAT credit on capital goods. The Tribunal held that the denial of CENVAT credit to the merged unit based solely on the lack of permission from authorities was incorrect. Additionally, it found that the appellant correctly availed the CENVAT credit on capital goods as per the rules. The impugned order denying CENVAT credit was deemed unsustainable and set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2019 14:21:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557141" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 401 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374774</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the transfer of CENVAT credit in the merger of two units and the availment of CENVAT credit on capital goods. The Tribunal held that the denial of CENVAT credit to the merged unit based solely on the lack of permission from authorities was incorrect. Additionally, it found that the appellant correctly availed the CENVAT credit on capital goods as per the rules. The impugned order denying CENVAT credit was deemed unsustainable and set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>