https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374771 Review jurisdiction requires an error apparent in the impugned order to justify reconsideration. The Supreme Court found no such error in the challenged order and dismissed the review petition. The delay in filing was condoned, while pending applications were also disposed of. The operative outcome confirms that reconsideration was unavailable because the review materials did not disclose an apparent error warranting interference. en-us Wed, 06 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 Feb 2019 14:20:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374771 Review jurisdiction requires an error apparent in the impugned order to justify reconsideration. The Supreme Court found no such error in the challenged order and dismissed the review petition. The delay in filing was condoned, while pending applications were also disposed of. The operative outcome confirms that reconsideration was unavailable because the review materials did not disclose an apparent error warranting interference. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 06 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374771