<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 398 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374771</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, and the Supreme Court found no error, much less any apparent error, in the impugned order warranting reconsideration. The review petition was therefore dismissed, and the connected applications were disposed of. The note reflects a routine review outcome where the Court declined to reopen the earlier order in the absence of a discernible mistake.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2019 14:20:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557137" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 398 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374771</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, and the Supreme Court found no error, much less any apparent error, in the impugned order warranting reconsideration. The review petition was therefore dismissed, and the connected applications were disposed of. The note reflects a routine review outcome where the Court declined to reopen the earlier order in the absence of a discernible mistake.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374771</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>