https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374765 In a cheque dishonour prosecution, an accused who raises a plausible defence of forgery, misuse, or stolen cheques may be allowed to lead expert evidence on handwriting and ink entries to rebut the statutory presumption. The court treated such evidence as relevant to the defence and to the accused's right to a fair trial, and found the request bona fide, not intended to cause delay or vexation. The revisional order permitting expert examination was therefore upheld, and no ground was made out to interfere; the petitions were rejected on merits. en-us Wed, 09 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 Feb 2019 12:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374765 In a cheque dishonour prosecution, an accused who raises a plausible defence of forgery, misuse, or stolen cheques may be allowed to lead expert evidence on handwriting and ink entries to rebut the statutory presumption. The court treated such evidence as relevant to the defence and to the accused's right to a fair trial, and found the request bona fide, not intended to cause delay or vexation. The revisional order permitting expert examination was therefore upheld, and no ground was made out to interfere; the petitions were rejected on merits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 09 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374765