<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (9) TMI 132 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278512</link>
    <description>The court held that the authority issuing the show cause notice under Section 124 of the Customs Act does not need to be the same as the authority conducting adjudication proceedings under Section 122. The court emphasized that the functions of issuing a show cause notice and conducting adjudication are separate. Consequently, the petition was dismissed, ruling the show cause notice issued by the Assistant Collector of Customs as valid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2019 11:13:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (9) TMI 132 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278512</link>
      <description>The court held that the authority issuing the show cause notice under Section 124 of the Customs Act does not need to be the same as the authority conducting adjudication proceedings under Section 122. The court emphasized that the functions of issuing a show cause notice and conducting adjudication are separate. Consequently, the petition was dismissed, ruling the show cause notice issued by the Assistant Collector of Customs as valid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278512</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>