https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278507 Service rules requiring experience "as" a teaching post were construed to mean actual experience gained in that capacity, not only service in a regular substantive appointment. Teaching experience acquired by a Specialist in a teaching hospital in an ex officio role was held countable because the doctor was in fact engaged in teaching undergraduate and postgraduate students, and the rules did not expressly exclude such service. The exclusion of that experience was therefore unlawful, and the appellant was declared eligible to be considered for appointment as Associate Professor and for the Professorship vacancy. en-us Wed, 15 Dec 1982 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Feb 2019 15:40:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278507 Service rules requiring experience "as" a teaching post were construed to mean actual experience gained in that capacity, not only service in a regular substantive appointment. Teaching experience acquired by a Specialist in a teaching hospital in an ex officio role was held countable because the doctor was in fact engaged in teaching undergraduate and postgraduate students, and the rules did not expressly exclude such service. The exclusion of that experience was therefore unlawful, and the appellant was declared eligible to be considered for appointment as Associate Professor and for the Professorship vacancy. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 15 Dec 1982 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278507