<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>BUSINESS PROMOTION</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=114598</link>
    <description>Entitlement to input tax credit on a business promotion event depends on proving the expense was in the course or furtherance of business and that ITC was correctly availed; the evidentiary burden under Section 155 of the CGST Act rests with the claimant. Itemised invoices identifying the nature of services support ITC claims, while generic lump sum descriptions increase audit scrutiny, litigation risk, and potential disallowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2019 15:15:09 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:55:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557029" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>BUSINESS PROMOTION</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=114598</link>
      <description>Entitlement to input tax credit on a business promotion event depends on proving the expense was in the course or furtherance of business and that ITC was correctly availed; the evidentiary burden under Section 155 of the CGST Act rests with the claimant. Itemised invoices identifying the nature of services support ITC claims, while generic lump sum descriptions increase audit scrutiny, litigation risk, and potential disallowance.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2019 15:15:09 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=114598</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>