https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374754 The appeal was allowed by the Tribunal, remanding the matter to the adjudicating authority for further proceedings. The appellant challenged the denial of cum-tax benefit in computing service tax demand, citing the lack of evidence initially provided. After obtaining the necessary agreement, the appellant requested a remand for re-computation, which was supported by the Revenue. The Tribunal acknowledged the appellant's claim and remanded the case for fresh assessment based on the additional evidence to be submitted, ensuring a fair review of the cum-tax benefit issue. en-us Thu, 13 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Feb 2019 13:28:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374754 The appeal was allowed by the Tribunal, remanding the matter to the adjudicating authority for further proceedings. The appellant challenged the denial of cum-tax benefit in computing service tax demand, citing the lack of evidence initially provided. After obtaining the necessary agreement, the appellant requested a remand for re-computation, which was supported by the Revenue. The Tribunal acknowledged the appellant's claim and remanded the case for fresh assessment based on the additional evidence to be submitted, ensuring a fair review of the cum-tax benefit issue. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 13 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374754